Families Are Talking

The Impact of Interventions Designed to
Promote Parent-Child Communication about Sexuality

Douglas Kirby, Ph.D.
ETR Associates

Part 1: Table of Contents


Conclusions

In sum, the studies reviewed for this publication indicate that reaching parents through homework assignments may prove the most promising method of reaching large numbers of parents and actually having an impact upon parent-child communication.These studies also indicate that many types of programs do increase parent-child communication about sexuality, at least in the short term. This is encouraging.

Those interventions that actually involved parents and their children communicating together, either in their homes or in special sessions, were most likely to increase communication. In general, programs that were longer and more intensive had more positive effects than programs that were very short.

However, none of these programs currently show evidence of what many program developers had hoped for: actual reductions in adolescent sexual risk-taking. And, indeed, some of the programs show evidence, varying from weak to strong, that they did not change adolescent sexual behavior.

For at least three reasons, it is not surprising that these programs have not had a greater impact upon parent-child communication.

First, as already mentioned, many of the evaluation designs were relatively weak and might not have detected programmatically important impact.

Second, few of the evaluated programs were based on theory or research, such as a thorough analysis of the barriers to parent-child communication about sexuality and the possible solutions to those barriers. Few focused on potentially important antecedents to sexual risk-taking that parents might address, such as developing a closer relationship with their teens or appropriately monitoring and supervising them. In addition, many of the programs were knowledge-based rather than skill-based, and not all of them provided both adolescents and their parents actual practice talking about a variety of sexual topics.

Third, most of these interventions were very modest. More intensive interventions with follow-up activities over many months are likely needed both to initiate and maintain higher levels of parent-child communication about sexuality.

Based on the current evaluations of parent-child communication programs, it does not seem likely that programs designed simply to increase communication about sexuality represent a particularly promising approach to reducing adolescent sexual risk-taking.

This is due to the following facts:

  • Few parents are able or willing to participate in special programs for themselves and their children
  • Programs appear to increase parent-child communication only in the short term
  • There does not exist a clear, robust relationship between parent-child communication about sexuality and adolescent sexual behavior
  • None of the six studies that evaluated impact on actual sexual behavior found positive changes in that sexual behavior

This does not mean that efforts to increase parent-child communication should be dropped. After all, many parents value communication with their children and want help with that communication. In addition, parent-child programs may still be a worthwhile component in larger, more comprehensive, and more intensive programs to reduce adolescent sexual risk-taking.The scientific work remaining to be done is substantial because parent-child communication about sexuality appears to have a complex relationship with adolescent sexual behavior. For example, the effects of parent-child communication on adolescent sexual risk behaviors might only prove important if parents and young people have close relationships and parents either disapprove of teen sexual intercourse or strongly support contraceptive use.The effects of interventions might also be stronger when implemented with mothers rather than fathers, or with daughters rather than sons.

Numerous studies indicate that other family characteristics (parental support/connectedness and parental monitoring) are consistently related to adolescent behavior. It may be those characteristics, in combination with parent-child communication, that help to reduce adolescent sexual risk behaviors.1

There are multiple ways that parents can express their norms and influence their children's behavior, including their sexual behavior. Parent-child programs have typically encouraged parents to provide information about sexual topics and express their values.

There are, however, other important ways that parents and families more generally affect adolescent sexual behavior. For example, parents model responsible or irresponsible sexual behavior. Multiple studies have demonstrated that if a teen's mother had intercourse at an early age, gave birth at an early age, is single and dating, is single and cohabitating, or if an older sister is having intercourse or has given birth at an early age, then the younger teen is more likely to initiate intercourse at a younger age.2 Similarly, if the teen's sister gave birth as an adolescent, then the teen is also more likely to become pregnant or give birth. Parents can also influence their children's sexual behavior by appropriately supervising them. Many studies have found that appropriate monitoring and supervision are related to initiation of intercourse, frequency of intercourse, use of condoms, use of contraception, and pregnancy.3

Consequently, programs for parents may prove much more effective if they do not focus only upon increasing parent-child communication about sexuality but also upon these other ways in which parents can influence the sexual behavior of their adolescent children. For example, these programs can help parents become more connected with their children, supervise and monitor them more appropriately, model responsible sexual behavior, and respond appropriately to possible sexual behavior and pregnancy among older siblings.

If programs have these effects, they may prove much more effective at reducing adolescent sexual risk-taking than if they simply strive to increase parent-child communication about sexuality. Of course, helping parents do these things is much more challenging than helping them talk about sexuality.


References

  1. B. C. Miller, B. Benson, and K. A. Galbraith, "Family Relationships and Adolescent Pregnancy Risk: A Research Synthesis," Developmental Review, 2001, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-38.
  2. D. Kirby, Emerging Answers: Research Findings on Programs to Reduce Teen Pregnancy (Washington, DC:The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, 2001).
  3. Ibid; B. C. Miller, B. Benson, and K. A. Galbraith, "Family Relationships and Adolescent Pregnancy Risk: A Research Synthesis," Developmental Review, 2001, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-38.

Bottom of page


For more information, contact siecus@siecus.org.

copyright © 2003, SIECUS
Web Master: siecus@siecus.org
http://www.familiesaretalking.org