Families Are Talking

The Impact of Interventions Designed to
Promote Parent-Child Communication about Sexuality

Douglas Kirby, Ph.D.
ETR Associates

Part 1: Table of Contents


Programs for Parents of Students in Sexuality Education Classes

Schools represent the one institution in our society where nearly all youth are involved in an ongoing, organized, systematic manner. Approximately half of all youth are enrolled in school when they first initiate sexual intercourse.1 The vast majority of young people participate in some type of sexuality education program one or more times while they are in school. Given this considerable potential, a number of educators have tried to reach parents through school programs.

One way to reach the parents of students in sexuality education classes is to offer parent orientation programs associated with these classes.These programs can simply review for parents the topics and materials their children will cover in class.They can also provide parents with information and skill-building activities.

As part of its ENABL (Education Now and Babies Later) campaign, the California Office of Family Planning funded contractors to implement activities for parents.2 These activities included parent information sessions about the Postponing Sexual Involvement (PSI) curriculum, courses offering the PSI for Parents curriculum, and alternative activities, such as parent nights and PTA meetings at which ENABL was discussed. Parents of about 19 percent of all students in the ENABL study attended one or more of these events; most of them reviewed the PSI curriculum.

In a 17-month evaluation of middle school youth participating in ENABL, results indicated that students who received the PSI curriculum reported neither a significant increase in parent-child communication nor a delay in initiation of sexual intercourse. While these results are not encouraging,we should remember that this study measured the impact of parent activities upon all students who received the student PSI curriculum, not the impact upon only those 19 percent of students whose parents attended one or more parent activities.


References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance-United States, 1999," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, June 9, 2000, vol. 49, no SS-5.
  2. D. Kirby, M. Korpi, R. Barth, and H. Cagampang, Evaluation of Education Now and Babies Later (ENABL), Final Report (Berkeley, CA: University of California, School of Social Welfare,1995)

Bottom of page


For more information, contact siecus@siecus.org.

copyright © 2003, SIECUS
Web Master: siecus@siecus.org
http://www.familiesaretalking.org