Families Are Talking

The Impact of Interventions Designed to
Promote Parent-Child Communication about Sexuality

Douglas Kirby, Ph.D.
ETR Associates

Part 1: Table of Contents


Background

For decades, Americans concerned about young people have worked to increase parent-child communication about sexuality as part of their efforts to reduce the rates of teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted disease (STD), and HIV infection.Their efforts have been based upon several beliefs:

  • Parents are the primary sexuality educators of their children
  • Parents talk infrequently and inadequately with their children about sexuality because they have considerable difficulty discussing the subject
  • Effective parent-child communication about sexuality will lead to less sexual risk-taking on the part of young people
  • Properly designed programs can increase effective parent-child communication about sexuality and increase comfort with that communication, and thereby reduce adolescent sexual risk-taking

In addition, the concept of parents as the primary sexuality educators of their children is politically acceptable. For example, it is less controversial to help parents communicate their own values to their own children and thereby decrease sexual risk-taking behavior than to provide abstinence-only education, to teach sexuality or HIV education that discusses condoms and other forms of contraception, or to provide condoms or contraceptives through public institutions such as schools.

For all these reasons, people concerned about adolescent sexuality have developed programs for parents and their children, and sometimes for parents alone, to help parents communicate more effectively and more comfortably with their children about sexuality.

Numerous studies, of varying quality, have produced evidence that addresses the four basic assumptions stated above.The belief that parents are the primary sexuality educators of their children is both a philosophical statement about how things should be and a claim about how things actually are. The latter claim is partially supported by evidence demonstrating that while parents may or may not be the primary sexuality educators of their children, they are typically one of the most important sexuality educators of their children. Over the years, many studies, especially of college students, have listed possible sources of information about sexuality and asked the respondents to check the most important sources in their lives. Researchers concluded that peers, not parents,were the most significant source.1 In a review of 10 studies conducted during most decades from the 1920s on, Thornburg2 concluded that peers were consistently the single most important source of information about sexuality. Since the early 1940s, regardless of the age or gender of the respondent, there have been three primary sources of sexual information: peers, literature (or, more generally, the media), and parents.3 More recently, a 1993 survey reported that television, school, and home (in that order) were the three primary sources of information about AIDS for young people.4 Thus, parents were identified by some youth as the most important source of information, but they were not identified as the most important source by most youth.

In contrast are two studies conducted by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy which surveyed nationally representative samples of youth 12 to 19 years of age. Unlike the previous studies which asked about most important sources of information, these two surveys asked about who or what most influenced their actual sexual decision-making. Parents were most commonly identified (38 percent), friends were second-most commonly identified (32 percent), and only a small percentage identified the media (4 percent).5 These results suggesting a more important role for parents and a much smaller role for the media may reflect a more nationally representative and younger sample, and undoubtedly reflect the different question being asked, among other things.

Of course, survey data often do not adequately capture the many values about sexuality that are instilled in youth by their parents without any memorable conversations, or without any recognition on the part of the youth that they are internalizing their parents' values. In numerous ways, parents quietly model important values about sexuality. For example, whether they appear nude or partially nude in front of their children, whether they engage in sexual relations outside of marriage, and how they respond to their children's siblings or friends who give birth as teenagers undoubtedly affect the values of their children. Children may or may not recognize this modeling.

On the other hand, most of these studies suggest what most parents realize when children become teenagers: their teens' sexual beliefs, values, and behaviors may be more affected by peers, the media, and other sources as parents' relative influence diminishes. As a result, parents sometimes cease to be the primary sexuality educators of their children during the second decade of their children's lives. Despite the commonly stated belief that parents are the primary sexuality educators of their children, it is this recognition and fear that parents are displaced in this role, especially during their children's teen years, that motivates people to implement programs designed to help parents and to increase parent-child communication.

A large body of descriptive research has revealed that parents and their children commonly have difficulty talking with each other about sexuality. Significant proportions of teens report very little direct communication about sexuality with their parents, and most teens and parents are dissatisfied with some aspects of their communication about sexuality.6 Parents and their teens have identified as perceived obstacles to their communication some of the same concerns (e.g., potentially feeling embarrassed or possibly prying into the child's personal life) and some different concerns (e.g., if I talk to my teen about sex and/or contraception, (s)he is more likely to have sex; my teen won't be honest; or my mother will be suspicious if I ask any questions or say anything).7 Investigators have also examined the assumption that parent-child communication reduces adolescent sexual risk-taking by using related studies to analyze the relationships between parent-child communication and adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors. In this group of several dozen studies, investigators have sought to establish the extent of influence that parent-child sexual communication might have on adolescent sexual risk behaviors, especially early initiation of sexual intercourse and non-use of condoms or contraception.8 Unfortunately, methodological complexities such as measurement and sampling differences have made it difficult to draw conclusions from these studies.9 Nevertheless, these studies indicate that there is no simple and robust correlation between parent-child communication about sexuality and adolescent sexual behavior, but there is some evidence of several rather complex relationships. In particular, if mothers disapprove of teens having sexual relations, if communication takes place early, and if there is a close mother-child relationship, then mother-daughter communication may delay the daughter's initiation of sexual intercourse.

This review examines evaluated programs that have used various approaches to increase parent-child communication about sexuality and summarizes the studies that have measured their impact. It focuses primarily upon the impact of programs on parent-child communication, but it also summarizes the limited research on the impact of programs on adolescent sexual behavior or other determinants of that behavior.


References

  1. H. J. Rozema, "Defensive Communication Climate as a Barrier to Sex Education in the Home," Family Relations, 1986, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 531-37.
  2. H. D.Thornburg, "The Amount of Sex Information Learning Obtained During Early Adolescence," Journal of Early Adolescence, 1981, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 171-83.
  3. G. E. Dickinson, "Adolescent Sex Information Sources: 1964-74," Adolescence, 1978, vol. 13, no. 52, pp. 653-58; P. H. Gebhard, "The Acquisition of Basic Sex Information," The Journal of Sex Information, 1977, vol. 13, pp. 148-69; G.V. Ramsey, "The Sex Information of Younger Boys," The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1943, vol. 13, pp. 347-52; G. B. Spanier, "Sources of Sex Information and Premarital Sexual Behavior," The Journal of Sex Research, 1977, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 73-88.
  4. M. L. Smith, D. Minden, and A. Lefevbre, "Knowledge and Attitudes about AIDS and AIDS Education in Elementary School Students and Their Parents," Journal of School Psychology, 1993, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 281-92.
  5. National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy,With One Voice: America's Adults and Teens Sound Off about Teen Pregnancy (Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, 2001).
  6. M. K. Hutchinson and T. M. Cooney, "Patterns of Parent-Teen Sexual Risk Communication: Implications for Intervention," Family Relations, 1998, vol. 47, no. 2, pp.185-94; C.Warren, "Parent-Child Communication about Sex," in T. J. Socha and G. H. Stamp, editors, Parents, Children and Communication: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1995), pp.173-201.
  7. J. Jaccard, P. J. Dittus, and V. V. Gordon, "Parent-Teen Communication about Premarital Sex: Factors Associated with the Extent of Communication," Journal of Adolescent Research, 2000, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 187-208.
  8. B. C. Miller, B. Benson, and K. A. Galbraith, "Family Relationships and Adolescent Pregnancy Risk: A Research Synthesis," Developmental Review, 2001, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-38.
  9. J. Jaccard, P. J. Dittus, and V. V. Gordon, "Parent-Adolescent Congruency in Reports of Adolescent Sexual Behavior and in Communications about Sexual Behavior," Child Development, 1998, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 247-61; J. Jaccard, P. J. Dittus, and H. A. Litardo, "Parent-Adolescent Communication about Sex and Birth Control: Implications for Parent Based Interventions to Reduce Unintended Adolescent Pregnancy," in W. Miller and L. J. Severy, editors, Advances in Population: Psychosocial Perspectives (London: Kingsley, 1999), pp. 189-226.

Bottom of page


For more information, contact siecus@siecus.org.

copyright © 2003, SIECUS
Web Master: siecus@siecus.org
http://www.familiesaretalking.org